From cc6b6ea021645f93b339bc17df1cfaf92f079fd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Hodgson Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:31:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] clarify wording for trojan horsen --- proposals/1779-open-governance.md | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/proposals/1779-open-governance.md b/proposals/1779-open-governance.md index 58e43b80d..38469a06b 100644 --- a/proposals/1779-open-governance.md +++ b/proposals/1779-open-governance.md @@ -173,13 +173,13 @@ toxic culture of bullying or competitive infighting. Folks need to be able to compromise; we are not building a culture of folks pushing their personal agendas at the expense of the overall project. -We are particularly vigilant against 'trojan horse' additions to the spec - -features which only benefit particular players, or are designed to somehow -cripple or fragment the open protocol and ecosystem in favour of competitive -advantage. Commercial players are of course free to build proprietary -implementations, or use custom event types, or even custom API extensions (e.g. -more efficient network transports) - but implementations must fall back to -interoperating correctly with the rest of the ecosystem. +The team should be particularly vigilant against 'trojan horse' additions to the +spec - features which only benefit particular players, or are designed to +somehow cripple or fragment the open protocol and ecosystem in favour of +competitive advantage. Commercial players are of course free to build +proprietary implementations, or use custom event types, or even custom API +extensions (e.g. more efficient network transports) - but implementations must +fall back to interoperating correctly with the rest of the ecosystem. ### Spec Core Team logistics