|
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|
|
|
|
# MSC0000: Obvious relation fallback location
|
|
|
|
|
# MSC3825: Obvious relation fallback location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[MSC3440](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3440) defines
|
|
|
|
|
a way to use replies as a fallback for threads. For that it adds an
|
|
|
|
@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ And for other relations:
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period clients might still accept the old location for
|
|
|
|
|
threads until the ecosystem has been migrated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The goal is to merge this change immediately before threads land in the specification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Potential issues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a breaking change to an already merged feature. This means it will break
|
|
|
|
@ -99,7 +101,7 @@ users. Impact should be fairly limited.
|
|
|
|
|
## Unstable prefix
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Until this MSC has finished FCP, implementations should use
|
|
|
|
|
`im.nheko.mscXXXX.is_falling_back` as the fieldname instead.
|
|
|
|
|
`im.nheko.msc3825.is_falling_back` as the fieldname instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Dependencies
|
|
|
|
|
|