From a73dd9c37139c652441893579ad3b634d720c5d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard van der Hoff Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:11:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] clarification --- proposals/1772-groups-as-rooms.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/proposals/1772-groups-as-rooms.md b/proposals/1772-groups-as-rooms.md index a0b9ff2c5..61ae02b13 100644 --- a/proposals/1772-groups-as-rooms.md +++ b/proposals/1772-groups-as-rooms.md @@ -311,8 +311,8 @@ Several options: * Pull-based: the user that created the relationship (or rather, their homeserver) is responsible for copying access controls into the room. - This has the advantage that users can set up their own spaces to mirror a - space, without having any particular control in that group. (XXX: Is that + This has the advantage that users can set up their own rooms to mirror a + space, without having any particular control in that space. (XXX: Is that actually a useful feature, at least as far as PLs are concerned?) Problem: What do you do if the admin who sets up the PL relationship