Revert "Revert "MSC2033: Adding a device_id to /account/whoami""

proposals/2033-whoami-device-id.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Proposal to include device IDs in `/account/whoami`
+
+There are some use cases (namely using
+[Pantalaimon with bots](https://github.com/matrix-org/pantalaimon/issues/14))
+which could benefit from knowing the `device_id` associated with a token.
+
+
+## Proposal
+
+The `/account/whoami` endpoint receives an additional response field for the `device_id`
+associated with the access token. The field is optional because appservice users may not
+have a real device associated with them. Non-appservice users should always have a device
+associated with them.
+
+Access tokens are already associated with at most 1 device, and devices are associated with
+exactly 1 access token. Because of this, we do not need to worry about multiple devices
+causing problems. For more information, see
+https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.4.0.html#relationship-between-access-tokens-and-devices
+
+*Note*: Pantalaimon would likely require a `device_id` be returned and error requests
+otherwise. This should be considered expected behaviour by Pantalaimon in the MSC author's
+opinion.
+
+
+## Tradeoffs
+
+We could introduce a `/device/whoami` endpoint, however that is a less superior option. Most
+calls to `/device/whoami` would additionally need to call `/account/whoami` to determine the
+user ID of the account. We had might as well bundle the two pieces of information into the
+same request.