From 6665bc1e3e2074110834818bcb429e51e24f7939 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bruno Windels Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 16:35:05 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] clearer wording --- proposals/2674-event-relationships.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/proposals/2674-event-relationships.md b/proposals/2674-event-relationships.md index 0b3185398..251d494c3 100644 --- a/proposals/2674-event-relationships.md +++ b/proposals/2674-event-relationships.md @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ Relations may be redacted like any other event. The `m.relates_to`.`rel_type` and `m.relates_to`.`event_id` fields should be preserved over redactions, so that clients can still distinguish -redacted relations from other redacted events of the event type. +redacted relations from other redacted events of the same event type. One example is telling redacted edits (as proposed in [MSC 2676](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/2676)) apart from