From 3ef9c96456736b3da225d934f313f7d9f44bc21d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andy Balaam Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 14:29:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add some alternative fonts with more permissive licenses --- proposals/4347-emoji-verification-images.md | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/proposals/4347-emoji-verification-images.md b/proposals/4347-emoji-verification-images.md index ab6b6a488..06348b56a 100644 --- a/proposals/4347-emoji-verification-images.md +++ b/proposals/4347-emoji-verification-images.md @@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ proper attribution, which should be added to the spec text. original authors of the relevant images on OpenMojo might grant permission for use under a more permissive license if needed.) It would seem polite to contact OpenMojo either way before incorporating this change into the spec. + See the alternatives section for some other emoji sets that are released under + the more permissive CC-BY license. ## Alternatives @@ -134,6 +136,14 @@ proper attribution, which should be added to the spec text. further improve consistency, but might make life difficult for client developers who are not able to render certain image types. +* We could use a different emoji set for the images, especially if the CC BY-SA + license of OpenMoji is judged to be too restrictive. These emoji sets are + released under more permissive licenses: + + * [Emojitwo](https://emojitwo.github.io) + * [twemoji](https://github.com/twitter/twemoji) + * [noto-emoji](https://github.com/googlefonts/noto-emoji) + ## Security considerations This proposal is intended to improve security by making it easier for users to