From 2e268d63b39310567fb6c034c72fb0b12d1cae04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Travis Ralston Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 13:20:18 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Clarify that reports don't transit federation, but can still be received --- proposals/4260-report-user.md | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/proposals/4260-report-user.md b/proposals/4260-report-user.md index 9f7803d15..6246a7c60 100644 --- a/proposals/4260-report-user.md +++ b/proposals/4260-report-user.md @@ -95,7 +95,10 @@ POST /_matrix/client/v3/users/@alice:example.org/report as they require further thought and consideration - a future MSC may expand (or even deprecate) the report endpoints to support this added information. -* Reports are not federated. This is considered an issue for another MSC, like [MSC3843](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3843) or [MSC4202](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/4202). +* While reports against non-local users are permitted, this MSC does not introduce a way for those + reports to transit federation to the target's server. This is considered an issue for another MSC, + like [MSC3843](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3843) or + [MSC4202](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/4202). * Whether a user exists on the server is revealed through the new endpoint. Servers have the option to mask this detail by ignoring the report.