From 0baf49abe8287394bdf1f4ec536b09ab0c3f9474 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard van der Hoff Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:12:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] We are not considering hidden-membership rooms yet --- proposals/1772-groups-as-rooms.md | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/proposals/1772-groups-as-rooms.md b/proposals/1772-groups-as-rooms.md index 3c9f8a247..777d353bf 100644 --- a/proposals/1772-groups-as-rooms.md +++ b/proposals/1772-groups-as-rooms.md @@ -120,12 +120,9 @@ allow peeking; you have to be joined to see the members, and users who don't want to be seen by the public to be member of the group are added to the subgroup. -XXX: is there a use case today for having a group where users are unaware of the -other users' membership? e.g. if I am a member of `+scandalous:matrix.org` -should i have a way to stop other members knowing that I am? One solution here -could be "auditorium mode", where users cannot see other users' identities -(unless they speak). This could be added later, however, and would also be -useful for normal rooms. +In future, there may be a usecase for groups where members are unaware of the +other users' membership. This would also be useful for other rooms, and is left +for a future proposal. ## Flair