mirror of https://github.com/ansible/ansible.git
You cannot select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
204 lines
9.1 KiB
ReStructuredText
204 lines
9.1 KiB
ReStructuredText
Become (Privilege Escalation)
|
|
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
Ansible can use existing privilege escalation systems to allow a user to execute tasks as another.
|
|
|
|
.. contents:: Topics
|
|
|
|
Become
|
|
``````
|
|
Ansible allows you 'become' another user, different from the user that logged into the machine (remote user). This is done using existing
|
|
privilege escalation tools, which you probably already use or have configured, like 'sudo', 'su', 'pfexec', 'doas', 'pbrun', 'dzdo', and others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. note:: Before 1.9 Ansible mostly allowed the use of `sudo` and a limited use of `su` to allow a login/remote user to become a different user
|
|
and execute tasks, create resources with the 2nd user's permissions. As of 1.9 `become` supersedes the old sudo/su, while still being backwards compatible.
|
|
This new system also makes it easier to add other privilege escalation tools like `pbrun` (Powerbroker), `pfexec`, `dzdo` (Centrify), and others.
|
|
|
|
.. note:: Become vars & directives are independent, i.e. setting `become_user` does not set `become`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directives
|
|
-----------
|
|
These can be set from play to task level, but are overriden by connection variables as they can be host specific.
|
|
|
|
become
|
|
set to 'true'/'yes' to activate privilege escalation.
|
|
|
|
become_user
|
|
set to user with desired privileges, the user you 'become', NOT the user you login as. Does NOT imply `become: yes`, to allow it to be set at host level.
|
|
|
|
become_method
|
|
at play or task level overrides the default method set in ansible.cfg, set to 'sudo'/'su'/'pbrun'/'pfexec'/'doas'/'dzdo'
|
|
|
|
For example, to manage a system service (which requires ``root`` privileges) when connected as a non-``root`` user (this takes advantage of the fact that the default value of ``become_user`` is ``root``)::
|
|
|
|
- name: Ensure the httpd service is running
|
|
service:
|
|
name: httpd
|
|
state: started
|
|
become: true
|
|
|
|
To run a command as the ``apache`` user::
|
|
|
|
- name: Run a command as the apache uesr
|
|
command: somecommand
|
|
become: true
|
|
become_user: apache
|
|
|
|
Connection variables
|
|
--------------------
|
|
Each allows you to set an option per group and/or host, these are normally defined in inventory but can be used as normal variables.
|
|
|
|
ansible_become
|
|
equivalent of the become directive, decides if privilege escalation is used or not.
|
|
|
|
ansible_become_method
|
|
allows to set privilege escalation method
|
|
|
|
ansible_become_user
|
|
allows to set the user you become through privilege escalation, does not imply `ansible_become: True`
|
|
|
|
ansible_become_pass
|
|
allows you to set the privilege escalation password
|
|
|
|
For example, if you want to run all tasks as ``root`` on a server named ``webserver``, but you can only connect as the ``manager`` user, you could use an inventory entry like this::
|
|
|
|
webserver ansible_user=manager ansible_become=true
|
|
|
|
New command line options
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
--ask-become-pass, -K
|
|
ask for privilege escalation password, does not imply become will be used
|
|
|
|
--become, -b
|
|
run operations with become (no password implied)
|
|
|
|
--become-method=BECOME_METHOD
|
|
privilege escalation method to use (default=sudo),
|
|
valid choices: [ sudo | su | pbrun | pfexec | doas | dzdo ]
|
|
|
|
--become-user=BECOME_USER
|
|
run operations as this user (default=root), does not imply --become/-b
|
|
|
|
|
|
For those from Pre 1.9 , sudo and su still work!
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
For those using old playbooks will not need to be changed, even though they are deprecated, sudo and su directives, variables and options
|
|
will continue to work. It is recommended to move to become as they may be retired at one point.
|
|
You cannot mix directives on the same object (become and sudo) though, Ansible will complain if you try to.
|
|
|
|
Become will default to using the old sudo/su configs and variables if they exist, but will override them if you specify any of the new ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limitations
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
Although privilege escalation is mostly intuitive, there are a few limitations
|
|
on how it works. Users should be aware of these to avoid surprises.
|
|
|
|
Becoming an Unprivileged User
|
|
=============================
|
|
|
|
Ansible 2.0.x and below has a limitation with regards to becoming an
|
|
unprivileged user that can be a security risk if users are not aware of it.
|
|
Ansible modules are executed on the remote machine by first substituting the
|
|
parameters into the module file, then copying the file to the remote machine,
|
|
and finally executing it there.
|
|
|
|
Everything is fine if the module file is executed without using ``become``,
|
|
when the ``become_user`` is root, or when the connection to the remote machine
|
|
is made as root. In these cases the module file is created with permissions
|
|
that only allow reading by the user and root.
|
|
|
|
The problem occurs when the ``become_user`` is an unprivileged user. Ansible
|
|
2.0.x and below make the module file world readable in this case, as the module
|
|
file is written as the user that Ansible connects as, but the file needs to
|
|
be readable by the user Ansible is set to ``become``.
|
|
|
|
.. note:: In Ansible 2.1, this window is further narrowed: If the connection
|
|
is made as a privileged user (root), then Ansible 2.1 and above will use
|
|
chown to set the file's owner to the unprivileged user being switched to.
|
|
This means both the user making the connection and the user being switched
|
|
to via ``become`` must be unprivileged in order to trigger this problem.
|
|
|
|
If any of the parameters passed to the module are sensitive in nature, then
|
|
those pieces of data are located in a world readable module file for the
|
|
duration of the Ansible module execution. Once the module is done executing,
|
|
Ansible will delete the temporary file. If you trust the client machines then
|
|
there's no problem here. If you do not trust the client machines then this is
|
|
a potential danger.
|
|
|
|
Ways to resolve this include:
|
|
|
|
* Use :ref:`pipelining`. When pipelining is enabled, Ansible doesn't save the
|
|
module to a temporary file on the client. Instead it pipes the module to
|
|
the remote python interpreter's stdin. Pipelining does not work for
|
|
non-python modules.
|
|
|
|
* (Available in Ansible 2.1) Install POSIX.1e filesystem acl support on the
|
|
managed host. If the temporary directory on the remote host is mounted with
|
|
POSIX acls enabled and the :command:`setfacl` tool is in the remote ``PATH``
|
|
then Ansible will use POSIX acls to share the module file with the second
|
|
unprivileged user instead of having to make the file readable by everyone.
|
|
|
|
* Don't perform an action on the remote machine by becoming an unprivileged
|
|
user. Temporary files are protected by UNIX file permissions when you
|
|
``become`` root or do not use ``become``. In Ansible 2.1 and above, UNIX
|
|
file permissions are also secure if you make the connection to the managed
|
|
machine as root and then use ``become`` to an unprivileged account.
|
|
|
|
.. warn:: Although the Solaris ZFS filesystem has filesystem ACLs, the ACLs
|
|
are not POSIX.1e filesystem acls (they are NFSv4 ACLs instead). Ansible
|
|
cannot use these ACLs to manage its temp file permissions so you may have
|
|
to resort to ``allow_world_readable_tmpfiles`` if the remote machines use ZFS.
|
|
|
|
.. versionchanged:: 2.1
|
|
|
|
In addition to the additional means of doing this securely, Ansible 2.1 also
|
|
makes it harder to unknowingly do this insecurely. Whereas in Ansible 2.0.x
|
|
and below, Ansible will silently allow the insecure behaviour if it was unable
|
|
to find another way to share the files with the unprivileged user, in Ansible
|
|
2.1 and above Ansible defaults to issuing an error if it can't do this
|
|
securely. If you can't make any of the changes above to resolve the problem,
|
|
and you decide that the machine you're running on is secure enough for the
|
|
modules you want to run there to be world readable, you can turn on
|
|
``allow_world_readable_tmpfiles`` in the :file:`ansible.cfg` file. Setting
|
|
``allow_world_readable_tmpfiles`` will change this from an error into
|
|
a warning and allow the task to run as it did prior to 2.1.
|
|
|
|
Connection Plugin Support
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
Privilege escalation methods must also be supported by the connection plugin
|
|
used. Most connection plugins will warn if they do not support become. Some
|
|
will just ignore it as they always run as root (jail, chroot, etc).
|
|
|
|
Only one method may be enabled per host
|
|
=======================================
|
|
|
|
Methods cannot be chained. You cannot use ``sudo /bin/su -`` to become a user,
|
|
you need to have privileges to run the command as that user in sudo or be able
|
|
to su directly to it (the same for pbrun, pfexec or other supported methods).
|
|
|
|
Can't limit escalation to certain commands
|
|
==========================================
|
|
|
|
Privilege escalation permissions have to be general. Ansible does not always
|
|
use a specific command to do something but runs modules (code) from
|
|
a temporary file name which changes every time. If you have '/sbin/service'
|
|
or '/bin/chmod' as the allowed commands this will fail with ansible as those
|
|
paths won't match with the temporary file that ansible creates to run the
|
|
module.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. seealso::
|
|
|
|
`Mailing List <http://groups.google.com/group/ansible-project>`_
|
|
Questions? Help? Ideas? Stop by the list on Google Groups
|
|
`irc.freenode.net <http://irc.freenode.net>`_
|
|
#ansible IRC chat channel
|
|
|