* win_hotfix: new module to install Windows hotfixes
* revert to older module util loader style to satisfy the checks for now
* Changes from PR
* changed the test hotfix so we can run tests in shippable
* win_user_right: add module with tests
* fixed up name of module in docs
* forgot the test module
* fixed up whitespace
* changes made to win_user_right based on feedback
* moved away from using secedit to Win32 with P/Invoke
* tidied up copyright for documentation
The prompt_formats dict didn't get the 'prompt_ask_vault_pass'
item added for interactive --ask-vault-pass, which
caused "KeyError: u'prompt_ask_vault_pass'"
Fixes#27885
In answer to #2540, `aptitude` was introduced as tool of choice for running
upgrades in the apt module and installing new packages that arise as
dependencies during upgrades.
This recently lead to problems, as for example Ubuntu Xenial (16.04) ships
without aptitude (installed).
Studying the man pages of both apt-get and aptitude, it appears that we can
achieve the effects of `aptitude safe-upgrade` using
```
apt-get upgrade --with-new-pkgs --autoremove
```
while `aptitude full-upgrade` seems to be identical to `apt-get dist-upgrade`.
We use `apt-get` as described above as a fall-back in case that `aptitude`
cannot be found, issuing a warning when it does so.
Furthermore it introduces a flag `force_apt_get` which may be used to enforce
usage of apt-get (which does not issue a warning).
The integration tests are updated accordingly.
Cf. also the discussion in #27370.
Fixes#18987
* ovirt_templates: added option to name imported disk as a template
* ovirt_templates: added version_added to new attribute
* ovirt_templates: added alias for image_name and example
* added alias glance_image_disk_name for image_name
* example how to import image from glance as template
* improve description of template_image_disk_name
* Add new ITs for nxos_bgp, nxos_bgp_af, nxos_bgp_neighbor, and nxos_evpn_global
* Add nxos_facts IT and enhance existing tests
* switch nxos_feature tests to use bgp
* misc. test fixes
* Add checks for titanium in IT
* Handle non-titanium case in tests
* Add aggregate functionality to eos_vrf
* Add tests for eos_vrf aggregate option
* Remove test2 and test3 vrfs at the beginning of the eos_vrf tests
* Pull all vrfs
With aggregate, we need to get all VRFs and we then compare with
desired VRFs, instead of assuming it will be just one.
* New Module: Notification module for Office 365 Connector Cards (notification/office_365_connector_card)
* Updates per review
* Added connection check when in check mode
* Adding VMware tools module
Functionality: Waits for VMware tools to become available (running
state)
* Adding base integration test preparations
Until govcsim supports actual guest tool status, the tests are disabled
* Cleanup and better getvm method
* Updating Changelog
* Adding required metaclass and future import
* Rename to vmware_guest_tools_wait
* Cleanup of documentation
* Fixing review remarks
This PR includes:
- Removal of get_exception (sadly)
- Avoid deprecating 'state' parameter with aci_rest
- Small fix for querying using aci_rest
Signed-off-by: @bcoca
* template: fix KeyError: 'undefined variable: 0
For compatibility with the Context.get_all() implementation
in jinja 2.9, make AnsibleJ2Vars implement collections.Mapping.
Also, make AnsibleJ2Template.newcontext() handle dict type
for the 'vars' parameter.
See: d67f0fd4cc
Fixes: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/20494
* add units/template/test_vars
* intg tests for jinja-2.9 issues like 20494
test cases here are based on
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/20494#issue-202108318
Unfortunately, the Github interface does no longer allow me to edit a file in the GUI and then branch it in my personal clone for making a PR. It now only offers to make a PR using a branch on the ansible repository :-(
So committing this directly instead against my will, but per the guidelines this appears to be safe. Fingers crossed...
This commit provides an environment option to change the behaviour so
that it's possible to declare any changes shoudl be considered a junit
failure.
This is useful when carrying out idempotent testing to ensure that
multiple runs are safe and any changes should be considered a test
failure.
In a CI test of an ansible role the practice would be to run the role
once without this to configure the test system, and tehn to run a second
time including this environment vairable so that the CI engine
processing the junit report recognise any changes to be a test fail.
Matt Clay